Skip to content

Anonymising Contributors When It Matters

Les écrevisses à Longchamps (Crayfish at Longchamps)
Photo: Les écrevisses à Longchamps (Crayfish at Longchamps) by Print made by: Eugène Delacroix Printed by: Charles Motte (Public domain), via Openverse

Sometimes the most honest answer a vox pop can gather comes only when a contributor is offered anonymity, a small but meaningful protection for someone willing to share something they would not feel safe saying under their own name.

This protection needs to be handled carefully and consistently, since offering it selectively, only to some contributors and not others, can create a confusing or even misleading impression of who actually holds a given view within a piece.

Used thoughtfully, anonymity widens the range of honest opinion a vox pop can capture, allowing genuinely sensitive perspectives into the piece that would otherwise have gone completely unheard out of understandable caution.

Clear internal guidelines help here, setting out in advance the kinds of situations that genuinely warrant anonymity, so that the decision is made consistently and fairly rather than being improvised differently for each contributor depending on the mood of the crew on any given day.

Share this explainer

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.